Department of Capital Construction (UKS) presented
📂 For Education Students
👤 HotRef
Product Description
The Office of Capital Construction (UKS) filed a lawsuit to collect debts for performing work in the Arbitration Court of the region. Having studied the materials presented, the judge on the basis of Art. 150 APC of the Russian Federation refused to accept the statement of claim. He justified his decision by the fact that Art. 28 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation establishes that the arbitration court is subject to disputes only with the participation of legal entities and individual entrepreneurs, and the UKS does not have a certificate of state registration as a legal entity.
Give a reasoned opinion on the decision of the judge.
Option. UKS was established in 1959 by a resolution of the Government of the USSR as a structural unit of the regional executive committee. The Regulation on the UKS does not refer to the fact that it is a legal entity. At the time the lawsuit was filed, UKS had its own bank account, drafted and presented an independent balance sheet to state bodies, had a seal. In addition, the UKS was registered as a taxpayer with the state tax inspectorate, and statistics codes were assigned to it at the regional committee.
Give a reasoned opinion on the decision of the judge.
Option. UKS was established in 1959 by a resolution of the Government of the USSR as a structural unit of the regional executive committee. The Regulation on the UKS does not refer to the fact that it is a legal entity. At the time the lawsuit was filed, UKS had its own bank account, drafted and presented an independent balance sheet to state bodies, had a seal. In addition, the UKS was registered as a taxpayer with the state tax inspectorate, and statistics codes were assigned to it at the regional committee.
Additional Information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No Reviews Yet
Be the first to leave a review for this product!
Related Products
Solution of the K3 Option 10 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution K5 B1 termehu of Reshebnik Yablonsky AA 1978
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the D1 Option 10 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the K4 version 05 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the K3 Option 11 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of task 4.3.14 from the collection of Kepe OE
Seller: Михаил_Перович
Solution of task 4.2.13 from the collection of Kepe OE
Seller: Михаил_Перович
C2 Option 11 termehu of Reshebnik Yablonsky AA 1978
Seller: TerMaster