The General Director of Koleso LLC, at the request of his deputy, hired Gaykin as an auto mechanic without signing an agreement and paid for the work actually performed.
In the process of car repair, due to equipment malfunction, the car repaired by Gaikin was rendered unusable.
The General Director instructed the accounting department to recover damages from Gaikin in full, that is, the cost of the car he was repairing. Gaykin did not agree with the decision of the head of the company and explained that, first of all, his guilt in causing damage to the repaired car must be proved. He also explained that he is in a labor relationship with the company and therefore (in the case of proof of his guilt) he will compensate for the damage only to the extent of average earnings.
What are the relations?
How should this situation be resolved?

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.