After hearing the judicial debate, the judge was convinced that he had overlooked and had not investigated some important circumstances of the case.
How can he get out of the situation: try to fill the gap during the debate, resume the hearing from the very beginning or do something else?

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.