Joint stock company appealed to the court
📂 For Education Students
👤 HotRef
Product Description
The joint stock company appealed to the court with a claim to take 5 tons of cement from an individual entrepreneur.
In court, the representative of the company explained that in accordance with the concluded sale and purchase agreement, the individual entrepreneur undertook to supply him with the required amount of cement. The cost of 5 tons of cement is fully paid. However, the individual entrepreneur did not fulfill his obligations on the shipment of cement, in connection with which the JSC filed a lawsuit for forcing it to execute the contract.
The individual entrepreneur, in response to the lawsuit, wrote that, under the contract, payment for cement was to follow only after it was shipped. In violation of the terms of the contract, the joint-stock company paid the cost of the cement prior to its shipment, therefore the rules on reciprocal performance of the obligation (Article 328 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation) should apply to it, in accordance with which the joint-stock company is not entitled to reclaim the cement.
Solve the case.
In court, the representative of the company explained that in accordance with the concluded sale and purchase agreement, the individual entrepreneur undertook to supply him with the required amount of cement. The cost of 5 tons of cement is fully paid. However, the individual entrepreneur did not fulfill his obligations on the shipment of cement, in connection with which the JSC filed a lawsuit for forcing it to execute the contract.
The individual entrepreneur, in response to the lawsuit, wrote that, under the contract, payment for cement was to follow only after it was shipped. In violation of the terms of the contract, the joint-stock company paid the cost of the cement prior to its shipment, therefore the rules on reciprocal performance of the obligation (Article 328 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation) should apply to it, in accordance with which the joint-stock company is not entitled to reclaim the cement.
Solve the case.
Additional Information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No Reviews Yet
Be the first to leave a review for this product!
Related Products
Solution of the K3 Option 10 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution K5 B1 termehu of Reshebnik Yablonsky AA 1978
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the D1 Option 10 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the K4 version 05 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the K3 Option 11 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of task 4.3.14 from the collection of Kepe OE
Seller: Михаил_Перович
Solution of task 4.2.13 from the collection of Kepe OE
Seller: Михаил_Перович
C2 Option 11 termehu of Reshebnik Yablonsky AA 1978
Seller: TerMaster