Smolnov, who quit the state civil service in connection with the reorganization of the executive body of state power of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation, applied to the state institution of the employment service to recognize him unemployed. He worked as a leading specialist in the accounting and reporting department. The indicated posts belong to the senior group of posts of the state civil service. In the employment center, he was offered the job of an accountant in LLC Construction Company Zhilstroy. Smolnov refused this work, because the work offered to him is not a public service and, accordingly, he will not be granted the benefits and guarantees provided for public civil servants (extended annual paid leave, additional paid leave, subsidy for the purchase of housing, etc.), he was also not comfortable with that a six-day work week was established in the construction organization. Further, he was offered a job as a 1st-level specialist in the regional level tax authority (junior group of positions), which Smolnov also refused, referring to the low salary received in the federal executive bodies, as well as what he owes to be given a public position not lower than that which he held before dismissal. After the second refusal, they explained to him that they could not recognize him unemployed, because there was a rejection of two options for suitable work. Smolnov, considering the refusal unreasonable, applied for clarification to the district prosecutor's office.
Who is right?

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.