Indicate in which of the following cases
📂 For Education Students
👤 HotRef
Product Description
ndicate in which of the following cases and under what conditions a reversal of execution of a court decision is possible:
A) the decision of the justice of the peace satisfied the claim for the recovery of alimony for the maintenance of the child. By the decision of the district court, the claim was denied;
B) the decision of the supervisory court reversed the decision of the district court to recover the loan amount due to the falsity of the debt receipt;
C) the decision of the district court reversed the decision of the justice of the peace to recover earnings for the duration of the lower-paid work in view of the plaintiff’s refusal of the claim;
D) by the decision of the justice of the peace, the debt under the debt receipt of September 1, 1995 in the amount of 30 thousand rubles was recovered. Prior to the entry into force of the decision, the defendant paid the plaintiff 10 thousand rubles. By the decision of the district court on the appeal of the defendant, the decision of the justice of the peace was canceled, the claim was denied due to the absence of valid reasons for the plaintiff to miss the limitation period;
E) The decision of the district court satisfied the claim for reinstatement. By the ruling of the supervisory review court, this decision was canceled due to a substantial violation of substantive law, the claim was denied.
A) the decision of the justice of the peace satisfied the claim for the recovery of alimony for the maintenance of the child. By the decision of the district court, the claim was denied;
B) the decision of the supervisory court reversed the decision of the district court to recover the loan amount due to the falsity of the debt receipt;
C) the decision of the district court reversed the decision of the justice of the peace to recover earnings for the duration of the lower-paid work in view of the plaintiff’s refusal of the claim;
D) by the decision of the justice of the peace, the debt under the debt receipt of September 1, 1995 in the amount of 30 thousand rubles was recovered. Prior to the entry into force of the decision, the defendant paid the plaintiff 10 thousand rubles. By the decision of the district court on the appeal of the defendant, the decision of the justice of the peace was canceled, the claim was denied due to the absence of valid reasons for the plaintiff to miss the limitation period;
E) The decision of the district court satisfied the claim for reinstatement. By the ruling of the supervisory review court, this decision was canceled due to a substantial violation of substantive law, the claim was denied.
Additional Information
After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2009-2019 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.
No Reviews Yet
Be the first to leave a review for this product!
Related Products
Solution of the K3 Option 10 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution K5 B1 termehu of Reshebnik Yablonsky AA 1978
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the D1 Option 10 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the K4 version 05 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of the K3 Option 11 Dievskaya VA Malyshev IA
Seller: TerMaster
Solution of task 4.3.14 from the collection of Kepe OE
Seller: Михаил_Перович
Solution of task 4.2.13 from the collection of Kepe OE
Seller: Михаил_Перович
C2 Option 11 termehu of Reshebnik Yablonsky AA 1978
Seller: TerMaster