Voronin and Lyubshin brought to administrative responsibility under Art. 19.16 of the Administrative Code for misconduct committed under the following circumstances. Voronin borrowed 50,000 rubles from Lyubshin, leaving him with his passport as a pledge. Lyubshin lost his passport under unknown circumstances.
1. Are the actions of Voronin and Lyubshin correctly qualified?
2. Give a legal analysis of misconduct?

After payment you will be available a link to the solution of this problem in the file of MS Word. It should be noted that the problem solutions put up for sale were successfully handed over in the period 2003-2018 and could be outdated. However, the general algorithm will always remain true.